THE COST TO THE CITY — AND TO YOU — IF BREXIT IS STOLEN

The City generates enormous wealth for the UK — so this is our wealth that is at risk.

This is about the EU, the City of London, (one of the UK’s largest generators of wealth), and what it means to you.

The article below is written The City for Britain. It outlines just some of the benefits we could achieve from Brexit, and the huge risks if Brexit is in any way compromised.

The article summarises just five main points. It’s worth a couple of minutes of your time.

The Cost to the City if Brexit is Stolen

As things stand, the UK will leave the EU on 29th March.

If Brexit is stolen (and make no mistake, any delay is simply an attempt to reverse the referendum), we will lose the opportunity to supercharge and reinvigorate the industry.

Benefits that Brexit brings us and we will lose if Brexit is overturned include

1. We will lose the opportunity for better, lighter regulation

Outside of the EU, the City will be able to repeal, revise and avoid regulation that currently makes us less competitive and unnecessarily increases costs.

We have already seen MiFID2 drive business from the UK to the US due to the excessive administrative costs it has created. We will lose the ability to address this.

2. We will lose our commodities markets

The EU is requesting that the UK charges VAT on commodity derivatives. We are currently being sued by the EU for not imposing this tax, with (of course) the ECJ adjudicating.

If Brexit if overturned (or worse, we are stuck with May’s Withdrawal Agreement — no voice, veto or vote) the UK will be expected to charge VAT in an environment that is already seeing spreads narrow and margins fall. We will lose this business to the US and Asia.

3. We will lose tax-free transactions

The Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) is something our government has vetoed several times before. It was first put forward by the European Commission in 2013. The idea was revived in December 2017 as a pet project of French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire and raised yet again by French President Emmanuel Macron in July 2018.

More recently Olaf Scholz, German Finance Minister, called for a Financial Transaction Tax in a speech in November 2018 (the same speech in which he is reported to have called for France to relinquish its UN seat to the EU, a Eurozone budget and an EU army).

As a reminder of the potential impact, in the 1980s the Swedish government introduced a series of financial transaction taxes with the end result being that by the end of that decade more than 50% of all Swedish trading had moved to London.

Within the EU we will lose the ability to resist this.

4. We will lose Euro Clearing (and jobs)

The ECB has attempted to prevent Euro clearing outside of the Eurozone on several occasions before. The UK won its case against the ECB’s last attempt on a technicality and the court went to great lengths to show the ECB how to fix that technicality.

We will lose the ability to clear euros (and with it thousands of jobs) within the UK, unless…

5. We could lose Sterling and be forced to adopt the Euro

Whether or not you believe the story from Frankfurter Allgemeine that EU officials have discussed plans to force all EU members to join the euro by 2025, Roberto Gualtieri, the Italian MEP and member of the European Parliament’s Brexit Negotiation Team, confirmed the general ambition in an interview with Andrew Neil in 2017.

In this context, it is important to note that non-Eurozone EU nations, voting as a bloc, currently have an effective veto on the new European Banking Authority (EBA). This will disappear when the non-Eurozone states fall to four, which now seems likely to happen within the next five to ten years. At that point, Britain would lose whatever residual defence it currently has and would be forced to adhere to regulations designed for the benefit of the Euro.

Given the unsustainability of such a scenario, we would once again be faced with an existential binary choice: join the Euro, or leave the EU. This time, however, since we would have had to revoke Article 50 on an “unequivocal and unconditional” basis to get to this point, we would be at the mercy of the ECJ who would decide if we could attempt to leave a second time.”

First published by The City for Britain on 28 Feb 2018