Never Accept the Economic Arguments for Joining a Political Union

Never Accept the Economic Arguments for Joining a Political Union

Every argument for Britain’s membership in the EU seems to revolve around economics — like a bad infomercial promising “free trade” and “tariff-free zones” if you call now. But let’s not kid ourselves: the EU is not an economic union at heart — it’s a political union dressed up in a business suit.

When it started, it was called “the Common Market,” which sounds like a cheerful farmer’s market where everyone gets along. This economic bait — free trade and a tariff-free zone — was the shiny object that led Britain to join on January 1, 1973. Over time, the name evolved to the EEC (European Economic Community), and later, in 1993, to the European Union. That’s when the EU ditched its “friendly neighbourhood grocer” image and revealed its true form: a political union with ambitions that would make Napoleon blush.

This transformation didn’t happen overnight — it was a slow, sneaky process, like someone gradually replacing your tea with decaf and hoping you wouldn’t notice. But here’s the kicker: being part of the EU meant Britain was no longer calling the shots. Laws affecting British citizens were now being cooked up by the EU Commission — a group of unelected officials who seem to have skipped the memo on accountability and transparency.

Fast forward to today, and the EU is led by Ursula von der Leyen, who wasn’t elected by the public but magically appeared in the role, rubber-stamped by people no one remembers voting for. Her name was the only one on the list, which feels less like democracy and more like a rigged talent show. Honestly, it’s the kind of system that would make Vladimir Putin say, “Nice work!”

Let’s not mince words: the EU is about as democratic as a game of Monopoly where one player owns all the properties. It’s a club of failed politicians wielding power over 27 nations, which is precisely why Britain decided to pack up and leave.

Yet, despite this, figures like Caroline Lucas continue to peddle economic arguments for Rejoining, as if dangling a shiny pound coin will make everyone forget the sovereignty issue. Even if economic benefits existed — and that’s a big “if” — the principle remains: British laws should be made by British representatives, not by bureaucrats in Brussels who probably couldn’t find Cornwall on a map.

And let’s talk about von der Leyen for a moment. Her background in the German military raises eyebrows, not to mention uncomfortable historical parallels. Germany’s attempts to dominate Europe in 1870, 1914, and 1939 didn’t pan out through warfare, but now they seem to be playing a long game with treaties, manipulation, and centralized control. It’s like they swapped tanks for paperwork.

Britain now stands independent and free, but Keir Starmer seems to be quietly plotting a stealthy EU reunion tour — no vote, no referendum, just a sneaky shuffle back into the fold. His plan is so subtle it might as well come with a cloak of invisibility.

Fortunately, when Starmer inevitably faces defeat at the next election and Labour fades into irrelevance, Britain will have a chance to fully sever political ties with the EU and globalist clubs like the WEF. Under leadership from Reform UK, the nation can reclaim its independence, strength, and prosperity — and maybe even a sense of humour about the whole ordeal.

So, remember: economic arguments are just the bait. Don’t let anyone convince you to trade your sovereignty for a shiny promise of free trade — it’s a deal that’s bound to leave you short-changed.

The illusion of economic gains often masks the deeper, more critical implications of political union. Sovereignty is not a commodity to be traded; it is the cornerstone of a nation’s identity and its ability to govern itself. Britain’s departure from the EU was not just a rejection of economic entanglements but a reaffirmation of its right to self-determination — a principle that should never be compromised for short-term financial incentives.

Critics often argue that leaving the EU has brought economic challenges, but these are transitional hurdles, not permanent setbacks. History shows that nations thrive when they control their own destiny, crafting policies tailored to their unique needs rather than conforming to the mandates of a supranational entity. Britain now has the freedom to negotiate trade deals on its own terms, to regulate its industries without interference, and to prioritize the interests of its citizens above all else.

The push to rejoin the EU, however subtle or overt, ignores the lessons learned from decades of membership. The EU’s bureaucratic structure, its lack of transparency, and its tendency to prioritize political agendas over economic pragmatism make it an unsuitable partner for a nation that values its independence. The argument for rejoining often centers on economic benefits that are either exaggerated or speculative, while the costs — both financial and political — are conveniently downplayed.

Moreover, the EU’s ambitions continue to expand. Its drive for centralization, its attempts to forge a unified foreign policy, and its increasing encroachment on member states’ sovereignty make it clear that this is not an organization content with mere economic cooperation. It seeks to mold Europe into a single political entity, eroding the individuality and autonomy of its member nations. For Britain, rejoining would mean surrendering the hard-won freedoms of Brexit and accepting a future dictated by Brussels.

As Britain charts its post-Brexit course, it must resist the siren call of economic arguments that undermine its sovereignty. The true measure of success lies not in GDP figures or trade balances but in the ability to govern without external interference. Independence is not just an abstract ideal; it is the foundation of democracy, accountability, and national pride.

The path forward is clear: Britain must continue to strengthen its global partnerships, invest in its domestic industries, and embrace the opportunities that come with freedom. Reform UK and other advocates of independence must remain vigilant, ensuring that the country does not backslide into the very system it fought to escape. Sovereignty is not negotiable, and Britain’s future should be built on the principles of self-governance, resilience, and unwavering commitment to its people.

Lucas was an MP for the British Green Party for years. The Green party just like the Lib Dems have always advocated for the UK to be part of the EU . She retied at the 2024 General Election. Having got no where in persuading people to Rejoin the EU she is now Co President of the European Movement.

A little bit about this movement

Founded by Winston Churchill in 1949, the European Movement has been dedicated to fostering European unity. For more than 75 years, it has worked tirelessly to strengthen ties with neighbouring European nations.

Over the years its been highjacked by EU fanatics

• The European Movement is heavily funded by the European Commission (over half its budget in 2016) (€300,000 of its €500,000 budget).

These EU enthusiasts pushing for the UK to rejoin, like Lucas, overlook the fact that if we had stayed in the EU, we wouldn’t be receiving just 10% now, but 20%. Moreover, they fail to acknowledge the broader implications of rejoining, such as the potential loss of sovereignty and the concessions that would likely be demanded by Brussels. While some argue that economic ties could improve, it’s important to weigh this against the political and financial compromises involved.