Keir Starmer and Labour’s record over the last few years cannot be brushed under the carpet

One week from now, on 04 July, the British citizens will vote in the general election. A large number of voters are expected to support the Labour government led by Keir Starmer. By doing so, they will be backing a party that has consistently opposed the largest democratic vote in British history and has made every effort to overturn Brexit.

This is what voters should know about Keir Starmer’s Labour if they care about independence, sovereignty, and freedom…

There can be no doubt that Labour will win the election and Keir Starmer will form his new administration. In the latest MRP poll published yesterday, it predicted the following numbers of seats.

Find Out Now / Electoral Calculus MRP poll

• Labour: 450
• LibDem: 71
• Conservative: 60
• SNP: 24
• Reform: 18
• Green: 4
• Plaid Cymru: 4

[Source: Find Out Now / Electoral Calculus, 26 Jun 2024.]

The electorate will naturally vote how they wish, but they should know what they’re voting for

I will abstain from commenting on the policies of political parties that do not pertain to the fundamental principles of independence, sovereignty, and democracy. Nevertheless, with regard to these values, I deem it crucial to emphasize Labour as a significant and imminent threat. They imperil the transformation of the UK into a nation once again subservient to Brussels, thereby curtailing the government’s freedom to act in the best interests of its citizens.

Over the years, Sir Keir Starmer, the current leader of the Labour Party, has consistently showcased his inclinations and tendencies. Throughout Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, Starmer was a staunch supporter of his policies and decisions. However, his recent change in position does not negate his previous unwavering support.

With respect to Brexit, Starmer was resolute in his endorsement of a ‘People’s Vote’. This entailed advocating for a second referendum to nullify the verdict previously rendered by the British populace in the EU Referendum, a decision he opposed. Essentially, this represented an endeavour by the Labour leader and former Director of Public Prosecutions to subvert democracy.

Starmer’s support for the Benn “Surrender” Act is significant in the context of Brexit negotiations. The act effectively curtailed the government’s authority to negotiate with the EU Commission in any substantive manner. This legislative action had a notable impact on the UK’s approach to its relationship with the EU during this critical period.

Keir Starmer is about to kill the Brexit dream for good”

In today’s Daily Telegraph, there is an article by the renowned barrister Martin Howe KC, an expert on EU law, with the headline mentioned above. It’s important to note that the headline was written by the Telegraph and the author has stated that he does not agree with it. In the article, Howe clarifies that he disagrees with the headline.

“Starmer’s and Reeve’s comments about trying to negotiate with the EU to improve the terms of Brexit reveal their naivety about the EU and its objectives. Their attempt will either fail altogether in the face of the EU’s demands — probably the most likely outcome — but if they do a deal, it is likely to involve a very heavy price in loss of independence and control in return for modest trade benefits.”

Throughout parliamentary sessions, Sir Keir Starmer consistently voted in favour of legislation that aimed to impede the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union and to diminish its status as a sovereign nation. His voting record reflects over 40 instances where he supported such measures, thereby signalling his stance on the UK’s exit and independence.

In total, Starmer voted over 40 times for legislation to hinder the UK’s exit from the UK and/or its independence as a sovereign nation.

In both March and April of 2019, Mr Starmer lent his support to the proposition for a ‘confirmatory public vote’ on Brexit. This proposal was perceived as an endeavour to advocate for a repeated public vote until the desired decision was attained. Nevertheless, it faced narrow defeat. Moreover, Mr Starmer endorsed the Cooper-Letwin Bill, which aimed to forestall the UK from departing the EU without an agreement and to constrict the UK’s bargaining leverage.

Sir Keir Starmer stood firmly in support of the UK’s complete participation in the Erasmus+ student scheme and passionately advocated for the automatic granting of UK citizenship to many EU citizens. Additionally, he embraced other measures aimed at fostering closer ties with the EU.itating the entry of EU family members into the UK.

With a majority of 100 or so seats more than Boris Johnson achieved in In 2019, it is predicted that Starmer will wield an extraordinary level of authority, comparable to the power held during the reign of the original King Charles. Despite the release of a report today, the outcome is unlikely to change, but it will serve to better inform some voters. The irony lies in Starmer and his party’s apparent determination to shift this power back to Brussels. Focusing solely on matters of independence, sovereignty, and freedom, the conclusion drawn is that “in one week’s time, the nation will succumb to the anti-Brexit sentiments.”

The irony is that Starmer and his party seem intent on transferring this power back to Brussels.

Looking only at the issues of independence, sovereignty and freedom, the verdict is: ‘One week today, the country will go to the anti-Brexit dogs.’